In this film review, Dr Dhiraj explores Hwang Woo-suk’s groundbreaking cloning achievements in the thought-provoking documentary ‘King of Clones’, challenging scientific heroes’ ethical complexities – exclusively for Different Truths. 

On a stormy evening of June 24, seeking respite from the tempestuous weather, and nothing else to do, I finally found myself engulfed in the vast array of films offered by Netflix. An intriguing title caught my attention – ‘King of Clones’, the latest documentary just released the previous day. Under the bold film title, in smaller letters, it displayed – ‘From groundbreaking human cloning research to a scandalous downfall, this documentary tells the captivating story of Korea’s most notorious scientist.’ With curiosity piqued, I embarked on a journey into the tumultuous tale of Hwang Woo-suk, South Korea’s once-revered but ultimately disgraced cloning pioneer. 

Woo-suk is a South Korean veterinarian and researcher who gained international attention for his work in the field of cloning. He became known as the ‘King of Clones’ due to his ground-breaking achievements and contributions to the field of stem cell research and cloning technology. In the early 2000s, Woo-suk and his team at Seoul National University made headlines by claiming to have successfully cloned a human embryo, which was seen as a giant step forward in the field of reproductive medicine. 

It is probably the biggest scientific scandal of the modern age, which is the theme of the documentary film ‘King of Clones’. Directed by Aditya Thayi, the film probes into the realm of genetic engineering, pushing the boundaries of scientific and ethical considerations. This documentary served as a revelation, introducing me not only to the intricacies of cloning itself but also to the man behind the controversy — a figure who once stood as the embodiment of South Korean national pride but was ultimately exposed as a fraudulent scientist, mired in a web of deceit and bioethical transgressions.

The documentary unveils a riveting tale that not only deals with the intricate world of cloning but also shines a revealing light on the central figure at the heart of the controversy. This individual once celebrated as a symbol of South Korean national pride, was destined to take a dark descent into infamy. As the film meticulously unravels the layers of the narrative, we bear witness to a shocking revelation—that the man who once stood as a beacon of scientific achievement was, in reality, a fraudulent scientist entangled in a web of deception and moral transgressions. 

The film unearths the profound impact of this revelation, challenging our perception of scientific heroes and igniting crucial discussions on the delicate balance between scientific advancement and ethical responsibility. Through its meticulous exploration, the film raises profound questions about the boundaries of scientific ethics and the consequences of unchecked ambition. As the documentary unfolds, the veil of mystery surrounding cloning is lifted, shedding light on the profound implications it holds for the modern medical world. The film provides an insightful and thought-provoking examination of the potential implications and controversies surrounding cloning technology. With a balanced approach, King of Clones succeeds in explaining a complex subject matter, leaving audiences questioning the boundaries of scientific progress.

One of the documentary’s greatest strengths lies in its ability to present multiple perspectives on the subject. It doesn’t shy away from discussing the ethical dilemmas associated with cloning, including issues of personal identity, individuality, and the potential for exploitation. The inclusion of interviews with scientists, bioethicists, and even sceptics of cloning adds depth and breadth to the narrative, ensuring a well-rounded examination of the topic.

I found ‘King of Clones’ visually both informative and engaging. Through stunning cinematography, the film brings the laboratories and experiments to life, making complex scientific processes accessible to a wider audience. It skillfully combines interviews, scientific explanations, and real-life examples to keep viewers engrossed in the subject matter. The documentary strikes a balance between technical explanations and relatable storytelling, making it engaging even for those without a scientific background.

However, the documentary’s only slight drawback is its pacing, particularly in the middle section, where some scenes feel slightly repetitive. While the film effectively raises thought-provoking questions, it occasionally lingers too long on certain points, causing a minor loss of momentum. And, there are moments where the film explores tangential topics that, while interesting, could have been more tightly connected to the core narrative. While the documentary presents a wealth of information, it occasionally leaves certain questions unanswered. The film could have probed deeper into the potential long-term consequences of cloning or explored alternative viewpoints that challenge the prevailing narrative. Nonetheless, all this does not detract significantly from the overall quality and impact of the documentary.

In summary, ‘King of Clones’ is a must-watch documentary that fearlessly tackles the ethical complexities of cloning, presenting them in a compelling and engaging manner. It successfully combines scientific accuracy, emotional storytelling, and stunning visuals to create a thought-provoking and unforgettable viewing experience. Whether you are a science enthusiast, an advocate for bioethics, or simply curious about the frontiers of human knowledge, King of Clones is an enlightening documentary that will leave you pondering the profound questions it raises long after the credits roll.

Picture design by Anumita Roy

Dr. Dhiraj Sharma

Dr. Dhiraj Sharma is working as a faculty at Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab. He holds three PG Degrees, one PG Diploma, and a Ph.D. He has fourteen books and more than Seventy, nationally and internationally, published papers to his credit. Professionally, he is actively involved in writing, teaching, and research and personally working outside his comfort zone, he is a keen Birder; Nature & Wildlife Photographer; Realistic and Semi-Impressionist Painter.

See Full Bio